August 2010
Volume 10, Issue 7
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2010
Dissociation between biological motion and shape integration
Author Affiliations
  • Ayse Pinar Saygin
    Department of Cognitive Science, University California San Diego
  • Shlomo Bentin
    Department of Psychology, and Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • Michal Harel
    Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science
  • Geraint Rees
    Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London
    Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London
  • Sharon Gilaie-Dotan
    Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London
    Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London
Journal of Vision August 2010, Vol.10, 783. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ayse Pinar Saygin, Shlomo Bentin, Michal Harel, Geraint Rees, Sharon Gilaie-Dotan; Dissociation between biological motion and shape integration. Journal of Vision 2010;10(7):783.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

While studies have pointed to a relationship between form processing and biological motion perception, the extent to which the latter depends on ventral stream integration is unknown. Here, we took advantage of patient LG's neuropsychological profile to address this question. LG has developmental visual agnosia, with severe difficulty in object recognition, but apparently normal motion perception. LG reports recognizing people from the way they move, suggesting he may use biological motion to support perception. In a recent neuroimaging and behavioural study we presented LG's abnormal visual cortical organization (Gilaie-Dotan et al, 2009, Cerebral Cortex). LG exhibited deficits in form processing, normal motion processing, and significant abnormalities in his visual hierarchy. In particular, LG's lateral occipital (LO) region did not show typical object selectivity, while motion sensitive MT+ showed typical activation patterns. Here, LG and age-matched controls performed motion-direction judgments on point light displays depicting either biological or non-biological motion. Using point lights allowed us to investigate structure from motion perception without relying on shape connectivity that assists integration processes. The biological motion stimuli depicted a person walking to the right or to the left (but without translation, as if on a treadmill), whereas non-biological motion consisted of a rectangle moving to either direction. The stimuli were embedded in noise dots in order to obtain sensitivity thresholds, which were calculated adaptively. The noise dots were created by spatially scrambling the target motion. While LG showed a significant deficit in the non-biological motion task, his biological motion performance was clearly within the normal range. His intact biological motion perception was further confirmed in a second experiment using different stimuli and task (Saygin, 2007, Brain). These results suggest that successful biological motion perception can be achieved without strict reliance on the integrity of hierarchical ventral stream integration.

Saygin, A. P. Bentin, S. Harel, M. Rees, G. Gilaie-Dotan, S. (2010). Dissociation between biological motion and shape integration [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 10(7):783, 783a,, doi:10.1167/10.7.783. [CrossRef]
 This work was supported by the European Union.

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.