December 2010
Volume 10, Issue 15
Free
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   December 2010
Center-surround masks operate over a narrower range of orientations and spatial frequencies than overlaid masks
Author Affiliations
  • Lynn A. Olzak
    Psychology Department, Miami University of Ohio, Oxford, OH, USA
  • Patrick J. Hibbeler
    Psychology Department, Miami University of Ohio, Oxford, OH, USA
Journal of Vision December 2010, Vol.10, 75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/10.15.75
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lynn A. Olzak, Patrick J. Hibbeler; Center-surround masks operate over a narrower range of orientations and spatial frequencies than overlaid masks. Journal of Vision 2010;10(15):75. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.15.75.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

We measured the range of spatial frequencies and orientations over which masking occurs when masks are presented as annuli surrounding a center target disk. In one experiment, observers made hyperacuity-level orientation discriminations on the center disk, which contained a near-vertical, 4 cpd grating (10% contrast). In different blocks of trials, the orientation of the 4 cpd (10% contrast) mask was systematically changed away from vertical. In a second experiment, the observers made spatial frequency judgments on the center disc, and the spatial frequency of the mask was systematically changed away from 4 cpd. In the first experiment, masking disappeared between tilts of ±20-30 degrees off vertical, a much narrower range than overlaid masks, which continue to operate up to about ±80 degrees. In the second experiment, masking occurred up to about ±1 octave difference on spatial frequency. When masks are overlaid, masking occurs over a much wider range, up to ±2 octaves. These results suggest that to the extent that these types of masking reflects pooled gain control processes, the processes are in some way different between the two stimulus configurations. They may be entirely separate processes, or the processes may be the same, but a more limited pool of neurons in recruited in the center-surround configuration. Another possibility is that as the percept of the illusory contour separating center from surround becomes more salient with increasing orientation or spatial frequency differences, it acts in some way to restrict the masking/gain control process.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×