September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
Exogenous cue size modulates attentional effects
Author Affiliations
  • Katherine Burnett
    School of Psychology, Bangor University, USA
  • Giovanni d'Avossa
    School of Psychology, Bangor University, USA
  • Ayelet Sapir
    School of Psychology, Bangor University, USA
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/11.11.115
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Katherine Burnett, Giovanni d'Avossa, Ayelet Sapir; Exogenous cue size modulates attentional effects. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):115. https://doi.org/10.1167/11.11.115.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

A dual-task experiment was designed to determine whether attentional effects are modulated by the size of the exogenous cue. A random-dot kinematogram (RDK), containing 100 white dots, was presented in each visual quadrant. In one RDK, the dots moved in a coherent direction for 200 ms. On 50% of the trials, one of the dots in one RDK turned red. Participants reported the direction of coherent motion and the location or absence of the colour probe, and accuracy was measured. In the first experiment the exogenous cue was a luminance-change frame surrounding the RDK, “flashing” for 80 ms. The cue was uninformative for both the location of the coherent motion and the location of the colour probe. A validity effect was found for the motion discrimination, but not probe localisation. In the second experiment, the cue frame only surrounded the central region of the RDK, to spatially match the probe stimulus. The red dot probe was confined to the same central region of each RDK. A validity effect was evident for both tasks. A third experiment was conducted to ensure that the difference between Experiments 1 and 2 was due to the cue, rather than probe location uncertainty. The cue surrounded the RDK as in Experiment 1, but the probe was confined to the central portion of the RDKs as in Experiment 2. As in Experiment 1, there was only a validity effect for the motion discrimination task, confirming that exogenous spatial attention is affected by the size of the cue. These results suggest that the size of the exogenous cue must match the size of the stimulus in order to have an effect.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×