September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
Occipital TMS facilitates and hinders visual perception via a contrast gain mechanism
Author Affiliations
  • Francesca Perini
    Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Italy
  • Luigi Cattaneo
    Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Italy
  • Marisa Carrasco
    Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA
  • Jens Schwarzbach
    Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Italy
    Department of Cognitive Science and Education, University of Trento, Italy
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 1200. doi:10.1167/11.11.1200
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Francesca Perini, Luigi Cattaneo, Marisa Carrasco, Jens Schwarzbach; Occipital TMS facilitates and hinders visual perception via a contrast gain mechanism. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):1200. doi: 10.1167/11.11.1200.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can vary radically according to the state in which the brain is at the moment of stimulation. Two possible mechanisms by which single magnetic stimuli produce different effects according to the initial activation state of targeted neurons have been proposed: (i) TMS suppresses neural signals and (ii) TMS adds random neuronal activity. Here we explore these two hypotheses by investigating the psychophysical effects of TMS on early visual cortex under different conditions of contrast adaptation. We tested six participants in an orientation discrimination task, where neuronal activation of visual cortex before each trial was altered through adaptation either to a blank screen or to two flickering gratings. In half of the trials a single TMS pulse was delivered simultaneously with target. Adaptation decreased performance. The effect of TMS on performance depended on the state of adaptation: it increased contrast sensitivity after adaptation but reduced it in the absence of adaptation. Correspondingly, TMS had a differential effect on threshold according to adaptation: it increased thresholds without adaptation but decreased them after adaptation. Notably, TMS did not affect the asymptote in any condition. The fact that TMS changed thresholds but not asymptotes suggests that TMS acts at the input level of neuronal processing, i.e. at the synaptic level. Moreover, the finding that TMS had opposite effects on the two adaptation conditions, even at the same performance levels at threshold, contradicts the hypothesis of TMS state-dependency as a product of noise increase.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.