September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
Examining Eye Movements in Visual Search through Clusters of Objects in a Circular Array
Author Affiliations
  • Carrick Williams
    Psychology, Mississippi State University, USA
  • Alexander Pollatsek
    Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA
  • Erik Reichle
    Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, USA
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 1323. doi:10.1167/11.11.1323
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Carrick Williams, Alexander Pollatsek, Erik Reichle; Examining Eye Movements in Visual Search through Clusters of Objects in a Circular Array. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):1323. doi: 10.1167/11.11.1323.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Objects tend to be clustered in the environment. This clustering could affect both search processes and the eye movements used to execute a search. In order to examine this possibility, participants in the current study were asked to search for a complete O in an array consisting of eight clusters of four Landolt Cs arranged in a ring. The similarity of the distractors to the target was manipulated systematically by varying the size of the gap in the Cs, but the gap size for all of the Cs in a cluster was the same. Consistent with many search studies, the response time data were consistent with a serial self-terminating process. More importantly, eye movement data supported the serial processing model because clusters were fixated serially (either clockwise or counterclockwise) on most trials and (b) fixation times on a cluster reflected processing time on that cluster and were unaffected by the gap size of either the prior or succeeding cluster. In other words, processing difficulty of a cluster had no effect on later fixations, nor did the processing difficulty of a cluster affect fixations before that cluster was fixated. Furthermore, the pattern of fixation times on a cluster was similar to the pattern of response times in a secondary task where a single cluster was presented at fixation. These data extend the findings of Williams and Pollatsek (2007) in which search was through a linear sequence of clusters, and indicate that a serial search pattern is not confined to reading-like arrays.

NIH R01 Grant HD26765 to Keith Rayner and Alexander Pollatsek and NIH R01 Grant HD053639 to Erik Reichle. 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.