September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
Superior colliculus inactivation alters the influence of covert attention shifts on microsaccades
Author Affiliations
  • Ziad Hafed
    Physiology of Active Vision, Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, USA
  • Lee Lovejoy
    Systems Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, USA
  • Richard Krauzlis
    Systems Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, USA
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 495. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ziad Hafed, Lee Lovejoy, Richard Krauzlis; Superior colliculus inactivation alters the influence of covert attention shifts on microsaccades. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):495.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Microsaccades are tiny saccades that take place during gaze fixation. Although long considered to occur randomly, recent evidence suggests that these movements are systematically biased by covert shifts of visual attention. Here, we show that superior colliculus (SC) activity is necessary for this influence of attention on microsaccades.

In 19 experiments, we reversibly inactivated SC neurons representing peripheral visual locations while two monkeys performed a demanding covert attention task. In this task, monkeys maintained fixation while four peripheral rings appeared in each visual quadrant. One of the rings was a different color from the others, serving as the attentional cue. Random dot motion patches (0% coherence) appeared inside each ring, and after some random delay, a brief coherent motion pulse occurred in the cued quadrant and in the diametrically opposite location (distractor). Monkeys had to report the direction of the cued pulse, irrespective of the distractor. We inactivated the SC with muscimol (see Lovejoy & Krauzlis, Nature Neuroscience, 2010) and compared microsaccade behavior before (baseline) and after inactivation.

When a cue guiding attention appeared in the peripheral visual region affected by SC inactivation, this cue's nominal influence in biasing microsaccade directions (confirmed from baseline data) disappeared. When the cue appeared in the region diametrically opposite from the affected area, its effectiveness in biasing microsaccade directions re-emerged. Importantly, these effects were not accompanied by a reduction in the overall microsaccade rate, suggesting that peripheral inactivation did not impair the motor control of microsaccades.

We conclude that SC activity is causally involved in the previously observed relationship between microsaccades and covert shifts of attention to peripheral locations. We hypothesize that biases in SC activity during attentional allocation normally alter the overall balance of SC activity representing the foveal fixated goal, in a manner sufficient to periodically trigger small saccades.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.