September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
Cue Capture: When predictive cues hinder search performance
Author Affiliations
  • Stephen C Mack
    University of California-Santa Barbara, USA
  • Sheng Zhang
    University of California-Santa Barbara, USA
  • Miguel P Eckstein
    University of California-Santa Barbara, USA
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 499. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Stephen C Mack, Sheng Zhang, Miguel P Eckstein; Cue Capture: When predictive cues hinder search performance. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):499. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

There is evidence that the presence of predictive cues typically improves performance in visual search tasks (e.g. Eckstein et al., 2000; Palmer et al., 2000). Here, we present a novel finding in which search performance was hindered by predictive cues at high signal contrasts. Method: Participants performed a visual search task in which they were to identify one of five letters (A–E) at one of five signal contrasts embedded in white noise. In cued trials, four colored circles were overlaid on the image with their colors indicative of how likely they were to contain the target (Red:40%, Green:20%, Blue:10%, Yellow:10%). The arrangement of the cued regions was arbitrary and identical across trials and participants. In the remaining 20% of trials, the target appeared outside of the cue circles. For uncued trials, stimuli were constructed identically (including the probabilistic structure of the target location) except for the absence of the circles. Results: Performance at low signal contrasts was higher for cued trials than uncued trials, mirroring traditional cueing effects. However, at high signal contrasts, observers achieved higher performance on uncued trials than cued trials. We suggest that these results arose from the overweighting of information at cued locations which impeded performance when targets were easily detectable. Behavioral results support this hypothesis, as performance for the 20% trials in which targets appeared outside the four probabilistically-defined cue areas was significantly lower for cued trials (circles present) than uncued trials (circles absent). Additionally, the frequency of eye movements towards high contrast targets appearing outside of the four probabilistically-defined cue areas sharply diminished when the cue circles were present. Conclusions: While observers often exploit predictive cues to enhance visual search performance, suboptimal overutilization of that statistical information in the guidance of saccadic eye movements can hinder performance when targets are easily detectable.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.