September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
The composite face illusion and its disappearance with misaligned faces: An effect of metric distance or part separation?
Author Affiliations
  • Renaud Laguesse
    University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
  • Bruno Rossion
    University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 617. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Renaud Laguesse, Bruno Rossion; The composite face illusion and its disappearance with misaligned faces: An effect of metric distance or part separation?. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):617.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Strong evidence that faces are perceived holistically/configurally comes from the composite face effect/illusion: identical top halves of a face are perceived as being slightly different if they are aligned with different bottom halves. The illusion disappears when the bottom half of the face is moved away from the top half, so that the top and bottom halves are spatially misaligned. One unresolved issue is whether the composite illusion disappears in the misaligned condition because the two halves do not form a whole object anymore (i.e., they form two segmented parts), or because the bottom part is located away from the top part. To address this issue, 12 participants had to match two top halves of composite faces presented sequentially. The experiment was characterized by 3 conditions (“same”: both halves identical; “different”: both halves different; “composite”: top half identical, bottom part different) and 7 levels of alignment between the top and bottom halves: from spatially aligned, forming a whole coherent face, to completely misaligned (100% width of the face). Twenty-three base face identities were used. In the composite trials, accuracy rates decreased significantly compared to “same” trials, only in the completely aligned condition. Correct response times were also significantly increased only in that condition. Strikingly, even a small spatial misalignment (16.7% width of the face) between top/bottom parts in the composite face paradigm disrupted completely the influence of the bottom part on the perception of the top part, so there was no difference between all other levels of (mis)alignment. This observation implies, practically, that it is not necessary to use a wide spatial misalignment in such studies. From a theoretical standpoint, these data show that it is the spatial alignment/separation of the facial halves rather than the metric distance between the face parts that explain the presence/absence of the composite face effect.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.