September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
Differential development of audio-visual integration for saccadic eye movements and manual responses
Author Affiliations
  • Marko Nardini
    Department of Visual Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, UK
  • Jennifer Bales
    Department of Visual Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, UK
  • Samir Zughni
    Department of Visual Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, UK
  • Denis Mareschal
    Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Department of Psychology, Birkbeck College, UK
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 775. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/11.11.775
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Marko Nardini, Jennifer Bales, Samir Zughni, Denis Mareschal; Differential development of audio-visual integration for saccadic eye movements and manual responses. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):775. https://doi.org/10.1167/11.11.775.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The developmental time course of human audio-visual integration is currently unclear. In a simple task eliciting reflexive orienting, infants as young as 8–10 months show reaction time advantages for combined vs. single visual-auditory cues that exceed purely statistical facilitation (Neil et al, Dev Sci 2006). On the other hand, most children do not show similar multisensory advantages until after 7 years when tested with a manual button-pressing task (Barutchu et al, Dev Sci 2009). We propose that these differences may reflect differential development of reflexive orienting, dependent on the superior colliculus, and sensory decision–“making, dependent on cortical integration of sensory evidence. To test this our aim is to compare the development of multisensory orienting and button-pressing for the same audio-visual stimuli. In an initial study we recorded eye movements of children aged 4–13 years (N = 19) in response to visual (V) flashes, auditory (A) beeps, or both (AV), presented at 20° eccentricity. Subjects first fixated a central cross that disappeared 1300–2300 ms before the stimulus onset in order to avoid cue competition. Overall, mean AV saccadic latencies were significantly shorter than either A or V, and the group as a whole showed a trend towards AV latencies shorter than those predicted by statistical facilitation (Miller, Cog Sci 1982). These results indicate that unlike in button-pressing tasks, children aged 4 years and above can show reaction time advantages consistent with cue integration when tested with a simple saccadic orienting task. We propose that this capacity depends on early-developing subcortical multisensory processing (Wallace & Stein, J Neurosci 1997).

UK Economic and Social Research Council Grant RES-062-23-0819. 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×