September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
Recognition of tactile pictures is compromised by global shape acquisition
Author Affiliations
  • Amy Kalia
    Brain and Cognitive Sciences, M.I.T., USA
  • Pawan Sinha
    Brain and Cognitive Sciences, M.I.T., USA
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 782. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/11.11.782
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Amy Kalia, Pawan Sinha; Recognition of tactile pictures is compromised by global shape acquisition. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):782. https://doi.org/10.1167/11.11.782.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated that sighted and blind individuals find it difficult to recognize two-dimensional tactile pictures of common objects. However, it is still not clear what makes recognition of tactile pictures so difficult. One possibility is that observers have difficulty acquiring global shape from haptic information when feeling the images. Alternatively, observers may have an accurate understanding of the shape but are unable to link it to a particular object representation. We conducted two experiments to determine where tactile picture recognition goes awry. In Experiment 1, we tested blindfolded sighted observers on their ability to recognize an array of tactile pictures. We then correlated recognition with image characteristics that influence shape perception and object naming. We found that recognition of tactile pictures correlated with image characteristics that affect shape acquisition (symmetry and complexity). In Experiment 2, we asked sighted drawing experts to draw their perception of the tactile pictures after feeling them. The drawing experts produced three types of drawings when they could not recognize the tactile pictures: 1) drawings that do not look like objects, 2) drawings that look like incorrect objects, and 3) drawings that look like the correct objects. The majority of errors reflected an inaccurate perception of the global shape of the image (error type 1). Our results suggest that recognition of simplistic tactile pictures of objects is primarily inhibited by low-level tactile shape processing rather than high-level object recognition mechanisms. Furthermore, instances of recognition failure even with accurate shape acquisition indicate that tactile information might be stored as chains of simple local features without the synthesis of a global gestalt.

Fight for Sight Postdoctoral Fellowship, James McDonnell Foundation grant. 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×