September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
The influence of object-ground contact on perception of distance and size under severely degraded vision
Author Affiliations
  • Kristina Rand
    Department of Psychology, University of Utah
  • Margaret Tarampi
    Department of Psychology, University of Utah
  • William Thompson
    School of Computing, University of Utah
  • Sarah Creem-Regehr
    Department of Psychology, University of Utah
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 79. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kristina Rand, Margaret Tarampi, William Thompson, Sarah Creem-Regehr; The influence of object-ground contact on perception of distance and size under severely degraded vision. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):79.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Important to successful navigation is accurate understanding of one's location relative to other objects within an environment. Past research has reliably revealed that observers are accurate in judging absolute distance in their environments, indicated through walking without vision to a previously viewed on-ground target, both under normal and degraded viewing conditions. However, less research has focused on perception of targets positioned off of the ground plane. This may be especially relevant for navigation under low vision, given the consequences of misperceiving target locations. We explored whether support for Gibson's ground theory (1950) would be found with degraded viewing as has been demonstrated with relative distance under normal viewing conditions (Meng & Sedgwick, 2001). In the current study, normally-sighted observers viewed white spherical targets placed on stands through goggles that severely reduced visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in one of two conditions. In the high-visibility condition, targets were placed on a stand painted black, resulting in high contrast with the gray carpet. In the low-visibility condition, stands were painted gray, making them undetectable under low vision conditions. In two counterbalanced blocks, participants made size and absolute distance judgments to three different sized spheres (.203, .304, or .406 meter diameters) at three target distances (1.5, 2.7, and 4 meters). Participants in the high-visibility condition exhibited accurate distance judgments, whereas low-visibility condition participants drastically overestimated target distances. Similarly, the size of targets in the low-visibility condition was judged to be significantly larger than the size of targets in the high-visibility condition. To allow safe travel for those with low vision, these findings point to the importance of highlighting how potential hazards make contact with the ground plane so that hazards are not perceived as more distant than they are actually located.

This work was supported by NIH grant 1 R01 EY017835-01. 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.