September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
On The Precision of Attention Sets: Effects of Distractor Probability and Temporal Expectations on Contingent Capture
Author Affiliations
  • Daniel Blakely
    Florida State University, USA
  • Timothy Wright
    Florida State University, USA
  • Walter Boot
    Florida State University, USA
  • James Brockmole
    University of Notre Dame, USA
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 81. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Daniel Blakely, Timothy Wright, Walter Boot, James Brockmole; On The Precision of Attention Sets: Effects of Distractor Probability and Temporal Expectations on Contingent Capture. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):81. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

The contingent spatial blink paradigm developed by Folk, Leber, and Egeth (2002) reveals a surprising lack of precision when it comes to our ability to maintain attention goals (sets). A completely irrelevant distractor sharing the color of a target letter in an RSVP (rapid serial visual presentation) stream produces a substantial attention capture effect, even when this distractor is distant from the RSVP stream, and the target's spatial location is central and constant. We examined whether the precision of attention sets can be improved by manipulating participants' expectations. In one experiment, the probability of the target-color-matching distractor was manipulated between groups to appear frequently or infrequently. We hypothesized that participants who encountered the peripheral distractor more frequently would develop a more precise attention set encompassing only the target's location, resulting in less capture. Consistent with this hypothesis, capture effects were smaller when the distractor's occurrence was frequent. We also manipulated the probability of the distractor occurring at a specific location, but found that consistent distractor location did not elicit less capture compared to when the distractor had a chance of occurring at four possible locations. Finally, we examined the possibility of training participants to adopt a temporally narrow attention set. Training involved searching for a target that occurred in the RSVP stream randomly (broad temporal window), or searching for a target that always occurred in the middle of the RSVP sequence (narrow temporal window). However, when participants were transferred to a block of trials in which the target always occurred in the middle of the stream and distractors could appear before or after it, capture effects were equivalent across groups. The present study suggests that experience (i.e., distractor frequency) can modify attention sets, but the precision of attention sets is largely unaffected by temporal and spatial expectations.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.