September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
Visuomotor resolution for size is independent of conscious perception
Author Affiliations
  • Tzvi Ganel
    Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
  • Erez Freud
    Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
  • Eran Chazut
    Department of Education and Psychology, The Open University of Israel, Raanana, Israel
  • Daneil Algom
    Department of Psychology, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 961. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Tzvi Ganel, Erez Freud, Eran Chazut, Daneil Algom; Visuomotor resolution for size is independent of conscious perception. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):961.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Human resolution power in the various senses is experimentally determined by a range of known psychophysical methods. A trivial yet critically important feature of classical psychophysics is that its methods are based on conscious perception. In contrast, grasping of the same stimuli might be less conscious. Recent findings from our laboratory showed that Weber's law, a pillar of classical psychophysics, does not necessarily hold when people grasp rather than perceptually evaluate the size of objects presented for view. Moreover, the trajectories of the fingers during grasping can be dissociated from people's conscious perception of size. In the current study, we integrated these two lines of evidence in order to compare grasping and perceptual sensitivity to differences in size that were set below the Just Noticeable Difference (JND). In Experiment 1, participants were asked to make size comparisons for pairs of objects and then to grasp the objects. In a second experiment, a similar paradigm was used but now subjects made perceptual estimations of size instead of grasping. The results showed that perceptual estimations were not sensitive to differences in size smaller than the JND. This pattern of results was found for both correct and erroneous size-comparisons trials. In contrast, grasping trajectories showed sensitivity to object size differences regardless of the JND. This pattern was observed even in trials in which perceptual size comparison were erroneous. Participants were not aware, therefore, whether their size discrimination via grasp was or was not veridical. These findings show that human resolution power is not fully captured by the classic perceptual JND. Grasping can exhibit greater resolution power than that measured via conscious visual perception.

This study was supported by an Israel Science Foundation (ISF) grant 830/07 to T.G. 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.