Purchase this article with an account.
Scott Holmes, Ali Mulla, Lisa Smuskowitz, Matthew Heath; Dynamic early adherence and late violation of Weber's law in goal-directed grasping. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):965. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/11.11.965.
Download citation file:
© ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)
An exemplar metric of goal-directed grasping (i.e., peak grip aperture) has been shown to be refractory to a psychophysical principle governing visuoperceptual estimations of object size (i.e., Weber's law: Ganel et al., 2008: Curr Biol). This dissociation suggests that vision for action and vision for perception are mediated by absolute and relative visual information, respectively. The present investigation examined whether aperture shaping elicits a unitary or time-dependent violation of Weber's law. To address this issue we asked one group of participants (i.e., perceptual task: N = 11) to provide a pantomime size estimation of differently sized objects (20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 mm of width) and had a separate group of participants (i.e., motor task: N = 16) complete goal-directed grasps of the same objects. For the perceptual task, just noticeable difference (JND) scores were computed when participants indicated that their hand opening matched the size of the target object. Importantly, motor task JNDs were computed at peak grip aperture as well as at normalized deciles of the response (i.e., 10% through 90% of grasping time). As expected, JNDs for the perceptual tasks increased with increasing target size (i.e., Weber's law). For the motor task, JNDs during the early and middle stages of the trajectory scaled to object size whereas values late in the trajectory (>50% of grasping time and including the time of peak grip aperture) did not. In other words, results for the motor task show an early, but note late, adherence to Weber's law. These results indicate that actions are not specified by a unitary and absolute visual code; rather, the time-dependent scaling of JNDs indicates a dynamic interplay between early movement programming via relative visual information and later movement control via absolute visual information.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only