September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
Does primary visual cortex operate in the universal language of modality-independent space? Insights from fMRI in the congenitally and late blind
Author Affiliations
  • Lora Likova
    The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, USA
  • Ming Mei
    The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, USA
  • Spero Nicholas
    The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, USA
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 995. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lora Likova, Ming Mei, Spero Nicholas; Does primary visual cortex operate in the universal language of modality-independent space? Insights from fMRI in the congenitally and late blind. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):995. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Visual cortex activity in the blind has been shown in sensory tasks. Can it be activated in memory tasks? Our recent results in short-term blindfolded subjects imply that human primary visual cortex (V1) may operate as a modality-independent “sketchpad” for working memory (Likova, 2010). We now raise the question of whether under long-term visual deprivation V1 is also employed in non-visual memory, in particular in congenitally blind subjects, who have never had visual stimulation to guide the development of the visual area organization. The outcome has implications for an emerging reconceptualization of the principles of brain architecture and its reorganization under sensory deprivation. Methods: We used a novel fMRI drawing paradigm in congenitally and late blind, compared with sighted and blindfolded subjects in three conditions of 20s duration, separated by 20s rest-intervals, (i) Tactile Exploration: raised-line images explored and memorized; (ii) Tactile Memory Drawing: drawing the explored image from memory; (iii) Scribble: mindless drawing movements with no memory component. Results and Conclusions: V1 was strongly activated for Tactile Memory Drawing and Tactile Exploration in these totally blind subjects. Remarkably, even in the memory task, the mapping of V1 activation largely corresponded to the angular projection of the tactile stimuli relative to the ego-center (i.e., the effective visual angle); beyond this projective boundary, peripheral V1 signals were dramatically reduced or suppressed. The matching extent of the activation in the congenitally blind rules out vision-based explanatory mechanisms, and supports the more radical idea of V1 as an modality-independent “sketchpad” whose mapping scales to the projective dimensions of objects explored in the peripersonal space. In higher occipital areas the differential pattern of engagement across the subject categories suggests progressive neuroplastic reorganization as visual deprivation is prolonged, in accord with an evolving cross-modal utilization of the occipital cortex to maximize its inherent functional potential.

NSF/SLC grant to LLikova. 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.