December 2011
Volume 11, Issue 15
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   December 2011
Adaptation and the perception of structure in radiological images
Author Affiliations
  • Elysse Kompaniez
    University of Nevada, Reno, Psychology, USA
  • Craig K. Abbey
    University of California, Santa Barbara, Psychology
    University of California, Davis, Biomedical Engineering
  • John M. Boone
    University of California, Davis, Radiology and Biomedica
  • Michael A. Webster
    University of Nevada, Reno, Psychology
Journal of Vision December 2011, Vol.11, 12. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Elysse Kompaniez, Craig K. Abbey, John M. Boone, Michael A. Webster; Adaptation and the perception of structure in radiological images. Journal of Vision 2011;11(15):12.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Radiologists often spend hours interpreting medical images. We are interested in the role that visual adaptation may play in the perception of structure in radiological scans. To focus our study, we concentrated on breast imaging, where a judgment of breast density is a standard component of the report from a screening mammogram. Images were taken from random sections within breast regions of normal mammograms and displayed on a CRT. Adaptation was measured with a standard asymmetric matching task. In one set of experiments, we asked whether the “unnatural” statistics of radiological images induce changes in the “natural” adaptation state of the observer. For example, the scans have steeper power spectra, and adapting to them produced shifts in the perceived spectrum of filtered noise consistent with adaptation to blur. In a second set, we asked whether adaptation could selectively alter the appearance of different scans. For example, exposure to an image of tissue classified as “dense” could bias an ambiguous target to appear more “fatty” or vice versa. Our results show that observers can rapidly adapt to the image structure in mammograms, and this could potentially be an important factor in the perception and learning of radiological images.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.