August 2012
Volume 12, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2012
Does memory enhancement training alter perceptual representations?
Author Affiliations
  • Juliana Rhee
    Department of Psychology, Harvard University
  • Talia Konkle
    Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Italy
  • Timothy Brady
    Department of Psychology, Harvard University
  • George Alvarez
    Department of Psychology, Harvard University
Journal of Vision August 2012, Vol.12, 299. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Juliana Rhee, Talia Konkle, Timothy Brady, George Alvarez; Does memory enhancement training alter perceptual representations?. Journal of Vision 2012;12(9):299.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Observers can learn statistical regularities and use them to hold more content in working memory (Brady, Konkle & Alvarez, 2009). Here we investigated whether this memory enhancement fundamentally alters the structure of perceptual representations as measured by a perceptual grouping task.

Memory-Training Task: On each trial, 8 shapes were displayed, followed by a brief delay, and then observers reported the shape that had appeared at a cued location. Shapes were paired such that 80% of the time certain shapes co-occurred (e.g., ‘shape A’-‘shape B’, ‘shape C’-‘shape D’, etc.). After completing 8 blocks of 60 trials, observers nearly doubled the number of shapes they could remember (to 6.5 shapes).

Perceptual-Grouping Task: Observers then performed three blocks of a color repetition detection task that is sensitive to perceptual grouping (Vickery & Jiang, 2009). On each trial, a row of alternating red and green shapes was presented, with one color-repeat along the row. Observers were instructed to detect the color repetition as quickly as possible and then report its location; the shapes were not task relevant and observers were instructed to ignore them. If trained pairs automatically form perceptual groups, then color-repeats within a pair should be more quickly detected than color-repeats across pairs. Additionally, to measure any pair-learning effects during the grouping task, we included a new set of "untrained pairs".

In the first block, observers detected color-repeats faster when they occurred within pairs than between pairs for trained pairs (~51.2 ms difference, p=.02), but not for untrained pairs (p>.05). The within vs between difference for trained pairs was not present after the first block of test trials.

Thus, learning arbitrary shape pairs through a memory training task affects performance in a basic perceptual task, suggesting that this training may give rise to fundamental changes in perceptual representations.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.