August 2012
Volume 12, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2012
Mind the curve: What saccadic curvature can tell us about face processing
Author Affiliations
  • Kaitlin Laidlaw
    Psychology Department, University of British Columbia
  • Thariq Badiudeen
    Psychology Department, University of British Columbia
  • Alan Kingstone
    Psychology Department, University of British Columbia
Journal of Vision August 2012, Vol.12, 406. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kaitlin Laidlaw, Thariq Badiudeen, Alan Kingstone; Mind the curve: What saccadic curvature can tell us about face processing. Journal of Vision 2012;12(9):406.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

There is a bias to look at other people’s faces. What drives this bias is unclear, however, and there is debate in the literature regarding whether upright faces capture attention more strongly than do inverted faces, or whether faces are processed more effectively by one hemisphere over the other. To investigate how faces attract attention, we adapted a traditional saccadic trajectory task. The examination of saccadic trajectories is well suited to exploring how attention is deployed to different face stimuli, as saccades aimed to target objects will show characteristic curvature in response to nearby distractor stimuli. When saccades are executed rapidly, a distractor will cause the saccades’ trajectory to curve towards the distractor’s location, indicating that it has captured attention. In contrast, when a saccade is executed more slowly, its trajectory will curve away from a distractor, suggesting that the object has been inhibited in order to better accommodate target selection. Further, the magnitude of a saccade’s curvature is determined in part by the saliency of the distractor: the more salient the distractor, the greater the curvature. With this in mind, we asked participants to make saccades to vertical targets in the presence or absence of task-irrelevant distractor faces (upright or inverted, presented in the left or right visual hemifield). Somewhat unexpectedly, face orientation did not strongly influence saccadic trajectory, suggesting that in this context, inverted faces capture attention as much as upright faces. Interestingly, presentation location did matter: faces presented in the left hemifield produced greater deviation away from the distractor than did faces presented in the right hemifield. Future studies are aimed at better understanding the implications of this effect and whether it is specific to faces.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.