August 2012
Volume 12, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2012
The cost of making saccades
Author Affiliations
  • Martina Poletti
    Department of Psychology, Boston University, 2 Cummington st, 02215, Boston
  • David Burr
    Department of Psychology, University of Florence, Via di San Salvi 12 Pad. 26, 50135 Firenze, Italy\nInstitute of Neuroscience, CNR – Pisa, Via Moruzzi 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy
  • Michele Rucci
    Department of Psychology, Boston University, 2 Cummington st, 02215, Boston
Journal of Vision August 2012, Vol.12, 438. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Martina Poletti, David Burr, Michele Rucci; The cost of making saccades. Journal of Vision 2012;12(9):438.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

A considerable body of evidence indicates that, after every saccade, spatial representations are updated on the basis of a copy of the saccade command. Since this corollary discharge may not match perfectly the actual saccade, this operation presumably comes at a cost. Here, we report results obtained with a novel gaze-contingent display procedure, developed to measure the average error introduced by each saccade, overcoming several limitations of previous studies. Observers were instructed to search for two hidden targets in complete darkness. They were told that the two targets would appear as soon as they looked straight at them. In realty, the targets were briefly displayed at the current gaze position after a predetermined number of saccades. Two conditions were examined: in the first (visual localization), at the end of the trial subjects adjusted the position of two cursors on the screen to match the remembered locations of the two targets. In the second condition (saccadic localization), subjects saccaded back to the remembered position of the first target at the end of the trial. In the absence of visual references, this task can only be performed on the basis of extraretinal knowledge of eye position. We show that subjects were able to reliably localize the two targets even after multiple saccades. However, every saccade increased the radius of the localization region by approximately 20', suggesting that this is the intrinsic error associated with corollary discharge. This loss of accuracy did not occur when visual references were present: a single 5’ dot displayed throughout the trial at the center of the monitor maintained performance constant irrespective of the number of saccades. That very similar results were obtained in the two conditions of visual and saccadic localization suggests that common spatial representations are used for both tasks.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.