August 2012
Volume 12, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2012
Time to decide: sampling based representation of uncertainty in human vision
Author Affiliations
  • Marjena Popović
    Graduate Program in Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02453
  • Dmitriy Lisitsyn
    Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114
  • Máté Lengyel
    Computational and Biological Learning Lab, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • József Fiser
    Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02453\nDepartment of Psychology and the Neuroscience program, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02453
Journal of Vision August 2012, Vol.12, 616. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Marjena Popović, Dmitriy Lisitsyn, Máté Lengyel, József Fiser; Time to decide: sampling based representation of uncertainty in human vision. Journal of Vision 2012;12(9):616. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Growing behavioral evidence suggests that animals and humans represent uncertainty about both high and low-level sensory stimuli in the brain for probabilistic inference and learning. One proposal about the nature of the neural basis of this representation of uncertainty suggests that instantaneous membrane potentials of cortical sensory neurons correspond to statistical samples from a probability distribution over possible features those neurons represent. In this framework, the quality of the representation critically depends on the number of samples drawn, and hence on the time available to perform a task. This implies a strong link between the available time and the reliability of the representation. We tested this hypothesis in an orientation matching experiment with two distinct types of stimuli: circles consisting of 1-4 Voronoi patches, each filled in with a number of gray-scale Gabor wavelets with their orientations sampled from a Gaussian distribution with a different mean orientation; and 2-10 differently oriented line segments spaced evenly on a circle. After 2 seconds of stimulus presentation subjects were asked to match the orientation of one of the patches or lines in the stimulus, and indicate their certainty about the correctness of the orientation match. To test our predictions, we manipulated the number of samples on a trial-to-trial basis by varying the time available to respond. Without time constraints, subjects’ performance and certainty judgment were significantly correlated independent of the number of patches or lines the stimuli consisted of. With a decrease in available time, subjects’ orientation and certainty judgments followed the theoretically predicted trends. Importantly, a decrease in response time lead to a decrease in correlation between performance and uncertainty, even though the performance remained unchanged. Therefore, limiting the response time, and consequently the number of samples drawn, significantly influences the quality of uncertainty representation in accord with the sampling hypothesis.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.