August 2012
Volume 12, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2012
Perceptual Filling-In During Binocular Rivalry Relates to Variation in Working Memory Capacity
Author Affiliations
  • Elizabeth Allen
    Psychology, University of Chicago\nInstitute for Mind & Biology, University of Chicago
  • Andrew Mattarella-Micke
    Psychology, University of Chicago
  • Sian Beilock
    Psychology, University of Chicago
  • Steven Shevell
    Psychology, University of Chicago\nInstitute for Mind & Biology, University of Chicago
Journal of Vision August 2012, Vol.12, 678. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/12.9.678
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Elizabeth Allen, Andrew Mattarella-Micke, Sian Beilock, Steven Shevell; Perceptual Filling-In During Binocular Rivalry Relates to Variation in Working Memory Capacity. Journal of Vision 2012;12(9):678. https://doi.org/10.1167/12.9.678.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

In binocular rivalry, perception typically alternates between each eye’s image, but percepts containing elements from both images are also possible. This study uses "patchwork" stimuli, in which each eye receives a complementary patchwork of two rivalrous images. Patchwork stimuli can evoke percepts with interocular grouping (complementary patches from each eye combine to give a coherent whole), and also percepts with filling-in (a feature that is physically present at one location perceptually "fills" neighboring locations), revealing a possible role for cognitive processes in rivalry (Kovács et al., 1996). The current study found that individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) are related to the frequency and stability of perceived filling-in with rivalrous stimuli. WMC reflects the ability to maintain relevant representations while simultaneously inhibiting irrelevant representations. It is related to perceptual stability of an ambiguous figure (Allen et al., VSS2011), but its role in binocular rivalry has not been established. Forty-three participants viewed images haploscopically that contained a 4x4 array of dots equiluminant to a yellow background (after Kovács et al., 1996). In the CLASSIC condition, each eye’s image had either all red dots or all green dots. In the PATCHWORK condition, each eye’s image contained half red and half green dots, with different-colored dots presented in complementary locations in each eye. WMC was assessed for each participant using the RSPAN task. WMC was correlated with the proportion of time participants reported filling-in (solid yellow percept) in both the CLASSIC (r=0.36, p<0.02) and PATCHWORK (r=0.31, p<0.05) conditions. Moreover, the stability of this percept was correlated with WMC in the CLASSIC condition (r=0.30, p<0.05 a priori one-tailed test). Other results were inconsistent with the possibility that Troxler’s fading caused these correlations. These results suggest WMC is related to a coherent perceptual experience during rivalry at retinotopic locations where there is interocular conflict.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×