August 2012
Volume 12, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2012
Visual Control of Posture is Not Affected by Challenging Cognitive Tasks
Author Affiliations
  • D. Alfred Owens
    Whitely Psychology Labs, Franklin & Marshall College
  • Kathleen Hoffman
    Whitely Psychology Labs, Franklin & Marshall College
  • Travis Catania
    Whitely Psychology Labs, Franklin & Marshall College
Journal of Vision August 2012, Vol.12, 828. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D. Alfred Owens, Kathleen Hoffman, Travis Catania; Visual Control of Posture is Not Affected by Challenging Cognitive Tasks. Journal of Vision 2012;12(9):828.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

It is well known that postural stability is enhanced by stable structure in the periphery, whereas optical flow in the periphery can destabilize posture and create vivid perception of self-motion (vection). The question of interest here is whether cognitive processes can influence apparently automatic visual control of posture. Recent studies have found that cognitive tasks can influence postural control, suggesting that mental imagery and visual control of posture involve shared resources. We investigated the effects of two cognitive tasks — the Brooks Letter Task (visuo-spatial) and Speech Shadowing (auditory-semantic) — on the postural stability of participants while they observed the interior of a room, which filled the visual field. The virtual room was stationary in the "Static" condition; the room oscillated slowly (0.1 Hz) toward and away from the observer in the "Moving" condition. Throughout both conditions, participants stood on a transverse bar, which was mounted on a force plate. Dependent measures included stance breaks and fore-aft fluctuations of posture recorded by a force plate. The results showed that stance breaks and fore-aft variations of posture were significantly greater in the Moving as compared with the Static condition. FFT’s confirmed that the differences in postural stability between Static and Moving conditions matched the frequency (0.1 Hz) of the oscillating room. Postural stability during performance of the cognitive tasks was no different than that during a control condition (no cognitive task). Our findings confirm the strong effects of peripheral visual stimulation on posture, and they indicate that this basic function is impervious to concurrent performance of both visual-spatial and auditory-semantic cognitive tasks.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.