August 2012
Volume 12, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2012
Size matters: Increasing stimulus size reduces thresholds in an amplitude spectrum discrimination task.
Author Affiliations
  • Bruno Richard
    Concordia University, Department of Psychology, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  • Bruce Hansen
    Dept. Psychology & Neuroscience Program, Colgate University, Hamilton, New York, USA.
  • Dave Ellemberg
    Dept. Kinesiology, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  • Aaron Johnson
    Concordia University, Department of Psychology, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Journal of Vision August 2012, Vol.12, 845. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Bruno Richard, Bruce Hansen, Dave Ellemberg, Aaron Johnson; Size matters: Increasing stimulus size reduces thresholds in an amplitude spectrum discrimination task.. Journal of Vision 2012;12(9):845. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

The relation of spatial content to spatial scales falls at a 1/fα in natural scenes (Field, 1987). Previous studies have demonstrated that the primate visual system is sensitive to this regularity by investigating peak alpha discrimination sensitivity. The findings surrounding human sensitivity have shown to vary considerably, ranging from peaks in sensitivity of alphas (i.e., amplitude spectrum slope) between 1.0-1.3, or peaks across the entire range of alphas – excluding 0.8 (Knill et al., 1990; Tadmore & Tolhurst, 1994; Hansen & Hess, 2006), while still, some have found no peak sensitivity across all alphas (Thompson & Foster, 1997; Johnson et al., 2011). One possible account of these differences may lie in the size of stimuli previously presented to participants, which has ranged widely from 0.75° to 10° of visual angle. Although the 1/fα relation has long been considered scale invariant (Field, 1987), it is likely that alpha discrimination may be benefited at coarser scales, therefore reducing thresholds and affecting peak sensitivity. We presented 7 different stimulus sizes (ranging from 1° to 8° in steps of 1.84) at the fovea and measured alpha discrimination sensitivity of 1/f noise stimuli. Results indicate that sensitivity to select alphas disappeared when stimulus size increased and surpasses 2° of visual angle, while smaller sizes exhibited similar peak sensitivity (1.0 – 1.3) as was found in more recent studies (e.g. Hansen & Hess, 2006). In addition, overall alpha discrimination thresholds decreased as a function of stimulus size and demonstrated a size tuning to the amplitude spectrum slope, which explains part of the variability between measured thresholds of studies that presented small stimuli (Knill et al., 1991) as opposed to larger stimuli (Johnson et al., 2011; Thompson & Foster, 1997).

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.