August 2012
Volume 12, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2012
Frontal extents are compressed in virtual reality
Author Affiliations
  • Cassandra Strawser
    Psychology Department, Swarthmore College
  • Brennan Klein
    Psychology Department, Swarthmore College
  • Ariana Speigel
    Psychology Department, Swarthmore College
  • Zhi Li
    Psychology Department, Swarthmore College
  • Frank Durgin
    Psychology Department, Swarthmore College
Journal of Vision August 2012, Vol.12, 913. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Cassandra Strawser, Brennan Klein, Ariana Speigel, Zhi Li, Frank Durgin; Frontal extents are compressed in virtual reality. Journal of Vision 2012;12(9):913. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Action measures reflect the calibrated relationship between perception and action (Powers, 1973). There is evidence that egocentric distances are underestimated in normal environments even though people walk them accurately. One basis for this claim is that when people are asked to match a frontal extent with an egocentric one, they set the egocentric interval much too large. Li, Phillips and Durgin, (2011) conducted such matching experiments in both (panoramic) virtual (VR) and real outdoor environments. Similar matching errors were found in both environments, as if egocentric distances appeared compressed relative to frontal ones. In the present study we compared action measures (visually-directed walking) for egocentric and frontal intervals in VR and in an outdoor environment. Walking estimates of frontal distances were relatively accurate in VR, but walking estimates of egocentric distances were short. Geuss et al. (2011) have interpreted such a pattern of data as indicating that egocentric distances, but not frontal extents, are compressed in VR. However, the ratios of walking in the two conditions exactly correspond to the matched ratios found in the matching task both in VR and in an outdoor environment. Moreover, we found that walking measures overestimate frontal extents in outdoor environments (see also Philbeck et al., 2004). It seems that frontal intervals and egocentric intervals are both compressed in VR. Frontal intervals may be matched relatively accurately in VR by walking measures because the compression of VR approximately offsets the errors that are normally observed in real environments. Walking actions are calibrated during normal use, but walking is normally used to cover egocentric distances, not frontal ones. Because frontal intervals appear larger than egocentric intervals, it should be expected that walking out frontal intervals will produce proportionally greater estimates than walking out egocentric intervals even in VR.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.