August 2012
Volume 12, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2012
Microsaccadic efficacy and contribution to foveal and peripheral vision
Author Affiliations
  • Michael McCamy
    Department of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA\nSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
  • Jorge Otero-Millan
    Department of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA\nDepartment of Signal Theory and Communications, University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
  • Stephen Macknik
    Department of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
  • Yan Yang
    School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
  • Xoana Troncoso
    Department of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA\nDivision of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
  • Steven Baer
    School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
  • Sharon Crook
    School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
  • Susana Martinez-Conde
    Department of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
Journal of Vision August 2012, Vol.12, 1015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/12.9.1015
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Michael McCamy, Jorge Otero-Millan, Stephen Macknik, Yan Yang, Xoana Troncoso, Steven Baer, Sharon Crook, Susana Martinez-Conde; Microsaccadic efficacy and contribution to foveal and peripheral vision. Journal of Vision 2012;12(9):1015. https://doi.org/10.1167/12.9.1015.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Our eyes move constantly, even when we try to fixate our gaze. Fixational eye movements prevent and restore visual loss during fixation, yet the relative impact of each type of fixational eye movement remains controversial. For over five decades, the debate has focused on microsaccades, the fastest and largest fixational eye movement. Some recent studies have concluded that microsaccades counteract visual fading during fixation. Other studies have disputed this idea, contending that microsaccades play no significant role in vision. The disagreement stems from the lack of methods to ascertain the precise effects of microsaccades on vision versus those of other eye movements, as well as a lack of evidence that microsaccades are relevant to foveal vision. Here we developed a novel generalized method, based on mathematical techniques previously employed to assess the strength of connection of two neurons, to determine the precise quantified contribution and efficacy of microsaccades to restoring visibility as compared to other eye movements. Our results indicate that microsaccades are the greatest eye movement contributor to the restoration of both foveal and peripheral vision during fixation. Our method to calculate the efficacy and contribution of microsaccades to perception can determine the strength of connection between any two physiological and/or perceptual events, providing a more powerful estimate of causality than correlation; thus we anticipate wide-ranging applications in neuroscience and beyond.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×