August 2012
Volume 12, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2012
The regularity after-effect: first or second-order?
Author Affiliations
  • Marouane Ouhnana
    Department of Ophthalmology, McGill Vision Research, McGill University
  • Jason Bell
    Department of Psychology, Australian National University
  • Joshua A. Solomon
    Department of Optometry and Visual Science, City University London
  • Frederick A. A. Kingdom
    Department of Ophthalmology, McGill Vision Research, McGill University
Journal of Vision August 2012, Vol.12, 1285. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Marouane Ouhnana, Jason Bell, Joshua A. Solomon, Frederick A. A. Kingdom; The regularity after-effect: first or second-order?. Journal of Vision 2012;12(9):1285.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Aim: Previously we reported a novel uni-directional after-effect termed the regularity after-effect, in which adaptation to a regular pattern caused a slightly less regular pattern to appear even less regular. Here we consider whether the after-effect is mediated by a first- or a second-order process. Method: Stimuli consisted of a 7 by 7 arrangement of elements on a baseline grid windowed through an aperture. The position of each element was randomly jittered from its baseline position by an amount that determined its degree of pattern irregularity. The elements of the pattern consisted of dark Gaussian blobs (GB), difference of Gaussians (DOG) or random binary (RB) patterns. Observers adapted for 60 seconds to a pair of patterns above and below fixation with a different degree of regularity, then adjusted the relative degree of regularity of two subsequently presented test patterns. The size of the after-effect at the PSE was given by the log ratio of the physical element jitter of the two test patterns at the PSE. Results: The after-effect transferred from GB adaptors to both DOG and RB test patterns, and from DOG and RB adaptors to GB patterns. Conclusion: Pattern regularity is an adaptable feature that is encoded by a second-order process. Candidate mechanisms include 1. second-order spatial-frequency channels; 2. the computation of average inter-element distances.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.