July 2013
Volume 13, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2013
Effects of magnification on depth perception and visually-guided reaching
Author Affiliations
  • Bing Wu
    Cognitive Science & Engineering Program, Arizona State University
  • Roberta Klatzky
    Dept. of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University
  • John Galeotti
    Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
Journal of Vision July 2013, Vol.13, 220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.220
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Bing Wu, Roberta Klatzky, John Galeotti; Effects of magnification on depth perception and visually-guided reaching. Journal of Vision 2013;13(9):220. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.220.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Previous experiments and computational analysis have shown that optical magnification not only changes the content of visual depth cues like texture gradients and binocular disparity (Purdy, 1960; Lumsden 1980), but also affects the availability of some cues (Du et al., 2001). How, then, are these depth cues combined and how is their relative effectiveness changed by magnification? Most previous research examined the perception of depth in action space and focused mainly on pictorial cues. The current study investigated the effects of magnification on spatial perception and guided action within arm's reach under microscope. In two experiments, magnification was optically created using a low-power stereoscopic microscope. The subjects looked through the microscope (magnification power of 1.05x, 3.5x, and 5.0x, or naked eyes) with one or two eyes (monocular vs. binocular), and compared the relative depth between two targets (Experiment 1) or directed a stylus from a starting point to a target (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, the consequences of magnification for the accuracy of relative depth judgments were assessed using a matching task. Under binocular viewing, matching error was found to increase with magnification and to be lowest with the naked eye. In contrast, performance improved with magnification under monocular viewing. In Experiment 2, where performance in a reaching task was tracked and analyzed, similar patterns were observed for action responses. The results suggest that changes in depth cues induced by magnification, particularly decreased effective range of distance and increased demands on accommodation, result in differential utilization of accommodation and binocular cues.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.