July 2013
Volume 13, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2013
The perceived onset of visual events
Author Affiliations
  • Chris Paffen
    Experimental Psychology & Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University
  • Ryota Kanai
    School of Psychology, Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex
Journal of Vision July 2013, Vol.13, 313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.313
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Chris Paffen, Ryota Kanai; The perceived onset of visual events. Journal of Vision 2013;13(9):313. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.313.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

What is the moment at which a visual stimulus reaches visual awareness? Previously, this question has been addressed by varying stimulus attributes such as contrast and intensity. These manipulations have shown differential effects on reaction times (RTs) and temporal order judgments (TOJs), which usually go in the same direction: stimulus manipulations that make RTs shorter also shorten perceptual latency for the stimulus measured in TOJ tasks.

In our experiments, we manipulated the size of Gaussian blobs or Gabors of different spatial frequency presented left or right of fixation. In RT experiments, participants were instructed to indicate as soon as possible whether a target stimulus appeared left or right of fixation. In TOJ experiments, participants indicated which of two stimuli presented left and right of fixation appeared earlier.

The results show that RTs are generally shorter for large stimuli, for both Gaussian blobs and Gabors of various spatial frequencies. On the other hand, the perceived timing of larger stimuli was delayed in TOJ experiments. Thus, when a large stimulus (e.g. 8 degrees in diameter) was presented simultaneously with a smaller stimulus (e.g. 1 degree in diameter), the larger stimulus was perceived to appear later.

We suggest that the differential effects of stimulus size on RT and TOJ reflect separate neural mechanisms being used in both tasks. The effect of size on RT can be attributed to the increased signal of a larger stimulus. For the TOJ task, however, we suggest that the judgment of perceived timing is made based on synchronized activity over a larger cortical surface. The perceived timing of larger stimuli will be delayed, since increasing stimulus size will increase the cortical surface over which activity needs to be synchronized.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.