July 2013
Volume 13, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2013
Working memory consolidation does not necessarily delay response selection: Disentangling the costs of task initiation and execution
Author Affiliations
  • Florian Sense
    Department of Psychometrics and Statistics, University of Groningen
  • Brad Wyble
    Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University
  • Mark Nieuwenstein
    Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen
Journal of Vision July 2013, Vol.13, 332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.332
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Florian Sense, Brad Wyble, Mark Nieuwenstein; Working memory consolidation does not necessarily delay response selection: Disentangling the costs of task initiation and execution. Journal of Vision 2013;13(9):332. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.332.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Does working memory consolidation delay response selection? According to previous research, the answer is yes. The basis for this conclusion lies in findings that show a psychological refractory period effect (PRP) for response times (RT) for a second target that follows shortly after a first to-be-remembered target. The interpretation of this result is that memory consolidation and response selection both require access to a slow and capacity-limited processing mechanism. As a consequence, response selection would be postponed until the consolidation of the first target has been completed (e.g., Jolicoeur & Dell’Acqua, 1998). In the current study, we challenge this interpretation on the basis of the results of a study in which we compared the PRP effect between two conditions. In the standard condition, a single to-be-remembered letter was shown for 100 ms and followed at a stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) of 100-600 ms by a digit that required a speeded parity judgment. In a second condition, the task was identical except that the blank interval separating the first and second targets was filled with an RSVP sequence of additional letters that each had to be reported at the end of the trial. As expected, the standard condition showed a decrease in RT with increasing SOA, reflecting a PRP effect. Strikingly, the RSVP condition revealed the same effect even though subjects were now consolidating additional letters into memory, and the number of letters encoded increased with SOA. These results show that the PRP effect is time-locked to the initiation of working memory consolidation upon detecting the first of a series of letters. This effect is explained in terms of an overhead cost associated with initiating the process of working memory consolidation.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.