July 2013
Volume 13, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2013
A prior for direct gaze
Author Affiliations
  • Isabelle Mareschal
    School of Psychology, The University of Sydney\nAustralian Centre of Excellence in Vision Science
  • Andrew Calder
    MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
  • Colin Clifford
    School of Psychology, The University of Sydney\nAustralian Centre of Excellence in Vision Science
Journal of Vision July 2013, Vol.13, 402. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.402
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Isabelle Mareschal, Andrew Calder, Colin Clifford; A prior for direct gaze. Journal of Vision 2013;13(9):402. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.402.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Introduction: Determining where someone else is looking is critical to successful social interactions. Surprisingly, however, very little is known about how others’ direction of gaze is interpreted. Here we apply a Bayesian framework to determine whether normal adults have a prior expectation for the direction of someone else’s gaze. Methods: Gaze discrimination thresholds were measured in normal adult participants using grayscale male and female synthetic faces whose eye deviations were independently controlled using Matlab procedures. Observers viewed the same face in a two-interval presentation and had to judge whether the gaze deviation in the second interval was to the left or to the right of the gaze in the first interval. Discrimination thresholds were measured around 5 baseline gaze deviations: direct, to the left and right of direct (e.g. ± 2deg) and extreme left and right deviations (e.g. ± 9deg). Observers performed the task in three different conditions: (a) no noise on the eyes; (b) noise on the eyes in both faces; and (c) a mixed condition with noise on the eyes in one face only. Results: Gaze discrimination thresholds were constant across the 5 baselines tested and raised when noise was added to the eyes. In the mixed condition, observers’ biases were shifted in a direction consistent with the noisy stimulus being perceived as more direct. Likelihood functions were derived from the threshold data in conditions (a) and (b) and observers’ data in the mixed conditions were fit with a Bayesian model. The model accounted for approximately 90% of the variance and estimates of the prior’s peak were near direct. Conclusion: Our data suggest that the adult nervous system internally represents a prior for gaze as close to direct.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.