July 2013
Volume 13, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2013
Probability Cuing Improves Perceptual Judgments
Author Affiliations
  • Britt Anderson
    Psychology, University of Waterloo\nCentre for Theoretical Neuroscience, University of Waterloo
Journal of Vision July 2013, Vol.13, 426. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.426
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Britt Anderson; Probability Cuing Improves Perceptual Judgments. Journal of Vision 2013;13(9):426. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.426.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Can probability improve the precision of perceptual judgments? Participants were briefly shown individual tilted gabor patches, and asked to reproduce the tilt. Unbeknownst to the participants some tilt angles were more likely than others; right tilts on the right and left tilts on the left (or vice versa) occured on 80% of the trials. Stimuli tilted in the high probability range were defined as "validly cued." Statistical analysis was with linear mixed effects models treating participant as a random effect. All three experiments demonstrated a reduced magnitude of absolute tilt error for validly cued stimuli, and no bias for orientation judgments. In Experiment 1 we had different participants use either their right or left hand for the matching task in order to assess for a congruency effect (greater effect of probability on the side of the responding hand). The valid cue effect was significant (p = 0.01), but not the congruency effect. This was confirmed by a within subjects manipulation in Experiment 2 where we had participants switch their responding hand midway through the task. Validly cued stimuli were judged more precisely (p = 0.01) and accuracy was not modulated by the side of the responding hand. Experiment 3 flipped the direction of high probability tilts midway through the task. Validly cued stimuli were still judged more precisely (p = 0.003), and a factor coding for the initial direction of high probability tilts was not statistically significant. Additionally, despite instructions emphasizing accuracy, all three experiments showed that validly cued trials were judged more quickly. In summary, using probability to cue an orientation range results in stimuli within that range being judged, on average, more precisely and more quickly. This pattern is similar to that seen with conventional attentional cues, consistent with their having a common mechanism.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.