July 2013
Volume 13, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2013
Simultaneous cueing at two discrete locations and lag-0 sparing: breaking the attentional spotlight
Author Affiliations
  • Brad Wyble
    Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University
  • Maxwell Bay
    Department of Neurology, UCLA
Journal of Vision July 2013, Vol.13, 472. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.472
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Brad Wyble, Maxwell Bay; Simultaneous cueing at two discrete locations and lag-0 sparing: breaking the attentional spotlight. Journal of Vision 2013;13(9):472. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.472.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Visual attention is frequently described as a spotlight that can focus on one location to the exclusion of others, and there are hundreds of experiments that support variations of this theory. However, like Newtonian mechanics, a description of a system that is sufficient at one scale can break down at a finer scale, revealing a more fundamental mechanism. Here, we show that cueing benefits can be triggered simultaneously at two locations without affecting the intervening region of the visual field provided that the cues are simultaneous. Participants viewed 4 concurrent RSVP streams, searching for two simultaneous letter targets among digit distractors. Cues were red lines presented above and below a cued stream. The size of the cueing benefits from two simultaneous cues on both targets was large enough that we can discount a mixture model explanation in which attention is sometimes present at one location and sometimes at the other but never both (see supplement). These effects were similar regardless of whether or not the two targets were in the same hemifield. In further support of simultaneous attention to two locations, we found in a second experiment that two targets are perceived more often when presented simultaneously than when offset by 100-300ms. These results are well explained by a gain-field theory (Cheal, Lyon & Gottlob 1994) in which the state of attention can vary at each location across the visual field. In this model, attention does not reside at any one location but can be active at multiple locations simultaneously. Two simultaneous cues or targets can evoke attention at two locations. However, if one target is given a 100ms headstart over a second target, the attentional focus collapses around that first target, producing behavior consistent with a unitary spotlight of attention.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×