July 2013
Volume 13, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2013
Orientation Discrimination in Periphery: Surround Suppression or Crowding?
Author Affiliations
  • Mingliang Gong
    Department of Psychology, Miami University
  • Lynn Olzak
    Department of Psychology, Miami University
Journal of Vision July 2013, Vol.13, 568. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.568
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mingliang Gong, Lynn Olzak; Orientation Discrimination in Periphery: Surround Suppression or Crowding?. Journal of Vision 2013;13(9):568. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.568.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Both surround suppression and crowding show impaired perception when targets are presented in periphery. They have been treated as different phenomena because they vary in many properties. For example, an inward/outward asymmetry of "masking" is found in crowding but not surround suppression. However, different stimuli and tasks (detection in surround suppression vs discrimination or identification in crowding) are employed when examining inward/outward asymmetry in the two phenomena. Surround suppression uses large surround annuli and detection tasks. Crowding experiments use small localized nearby "masks" and discrimination or identification tasks. Therefore, it’s unclear whether the discrepancy derives from the different stimuli or the different tasks. The current study was designed to disentangle the effects of stimuli and tasks. In the experiment, participants were required to perform an orientation discrimination task on center-surround stimuli using only the right eye. Fixation points were displaced 9 degrees to the left or right of the target center. On a given trial, one of two sharp-edged, 40-minute, 4 cpd grating stimuli appeared. The observer rated certainty of leftward vs. rightward tilt on a six point scale. Performance was measured in d'. In addition to the above control condition, two masking conditions were also run, each with a hemi-annulus mask surrounding the target on the left or on the right of the target (Petrev, Popple & McKee, 2007). Preliminary data showed a strong asymmetry effect, suggesting that task is the important variable in distinguishing between crowding and surround suppression. However, a large contrast-suppression effect was also observed, as is characteristic of surround suppression but not crowding. It may be that our particular combination of task and surround reveal a neural mechanism that differs from either surround suppression or crowding.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.