July 2013
Volume 13, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2013
Hysteresis in the Perception of Objects and Scenes
Author Affiliations
  • Sonia Poltoratski
    Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University
  • Frank Tong
    Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University
Journal of Vision July 2013, Vol.13, 672. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.672
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sonia Poltoratski, Frank Tong; Hysteresis in the Perception of Objects and Scenes. Journal of Vision 2013;13(9):672. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.672.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Recently, we have considered how categorization occurs when observers dynamically view objects and scenes (Poltoratski & Tong, VSS 2012). We developed a set of 16s ‘movies’ that smoothly transitioned between a single closely viewed object and the entire scene. We found that when observers made online reports of whether they perceived these movies as either predominantly ‘object’ or predominantly ‘scene,’ their responses were contingent on the direction in which the movie was shown. We found this hysteresis-like effect to be consistent across manipulations of the stimulus; herein, we sought to characterize its resilience to manipulations of observer criterion and motivation. In Experiment 1, we introduced a semantic manipulation that required observers to report either ‘time as object’ or ‘time as scene’ for each movie, rather than reporting both concurrently. This allowed us to identify periods of uncertainty, which could occur if the stimulus is not unequivocally perceived as an object or a scene. Even when accounting for uncertainty, a significant effect of hysteresis was still present (2.26s). In Experiment 2, we tested whether observers could avoid hysteresis when encouraged to do so, providing a monetary bonus for responding consistently across presentations of each movie and cumulative feedback between experimental blocks. In the first block, a typical hysteresis difference was found (3.53s). By the fifth block, participants reported using an alternative strategy to improve the consistency between their responses and ignoring the original object/scene task. We conclude that the hysteresis mechanism persists even with high motivation to respond consistently (in Block 1), but that observers can gradually learn to respond consistently by relying on alternative cognitive strategies to avoid their predisposition for hysteresis. With these two experiments, we show that the hysteresis effect for gradual transitions between objects and scenes is robust to manipulations of observer criterion and motivation.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.