July 2013
Volume 13, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2013
The cat and the fiddle: Task difficulty and semantic congruency of multimodal stimuli.
Author Affiliations
  • Bonnie L. Angelone
    Psychology Department, College of Science & Mathematics, Rowan University
  • Lyle Zanca
    Psychology Department, College of Science & Mathematics, Rowan University
Journal of Vision July 2013, Vol.13, 1084. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.1084
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Bonnie L. Angelone, Lyle Zanca; The cat and the fiddle: Task difficulty and semantic congruency of multimodal stimuli.. Journal of Vision 2013;13(9):1084. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.1084.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Previous research has investigated the effect of semantic consistency and inconsistency in the role of object perception, detection, and identification. There is mixed evidence for a relationship between scene relevancy and object detection (Biederman, Mezzanotte, & Rabinowitz, 1982; Hollingworth, 1998). While this research has utilized visual stimuli alone, other studies have shown facilitation of visual search performance in complex changing arrays with the presentation of an auditory cue that is uninformative and unrelated to the task (Ngo & Spence, 2010; Klapetek, Ngo & Spence, 2012). The current study investigated semantic congruency between auditory and visual stimuli and the effect these stimuli had on attention-based processes in a visual search task under differing levels of task difficulty. Observers viewed an array of six Snodgrass objects (presented in color) accompanied by an auditory stimulus that was either semantically congruent or incongruent with the target in a visual search task. When the task was less attentionally demanding (target category membership was easily determined), there was no difference in search for congruent and incongruent trials. However, when the task required more attentional resources (target category membership was more difficult to determine) visual search was both faster and more accurate for congruent compared to incongruent trials. Having semantically congruent (match) auditory and visual stimuli, compared to semantically incongruent stimuli (mismatch), facilitated performance and speeded reaction time but only when task demands increased. In addition, there was no difference when the visual search task was presented with no sound. This suggests that observers utilize congruent auditory information only when task difficulty is increased.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.