July 2013
Volume 13, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2013
Adaptation of saccadic eye movements involves different coordinate systems
Author Affiliations
  • Delphine Lévy-Bencheton
    CRNL Inserm U1028 UMR5292
  • Denis Pélisson
    CRNL Inserm U1028 UMR5292
  • Muriel Panouillères
    CRNL Inserm U1028 UMR5292
  • Christian Urquizar
    CRNL Inserm U1028 UMR5292
  • Caroline Tilikete
    CRNL Inserm U1028 UMR5292\nHôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer - Neuro-ophthalmology department
  • Laure Pisella
    CRNL Inserm U1028 UMR5292
Journal of Vision July 2013, Vol.13, 1217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.1217
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Delphine Lévy-Bencheton, Denis Pélisson, Muriel Panouillères, Christian Urquizar, Caroline Tilikete, Laure Pisella; Adaptation of saccadic eye movements involves different coordinate systems. Journal of Vision 2013;13(9):1217. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.1217.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Saccadic adaptation allows changes of saccade over time after repeated post-saccadic error (McLaughlin, 1967). Adaptation is known to occur in oculocentric coordinates and to be unidirectional: adaptation of rightward saccades does not transfer to leftward saccades. However, Zimmermann et al. (2011) proposed that adaptation can unfold in spatiotopic coordinates: outward adaptation of rightward scanning saccades transferred to all memory-guided double-saccades (including those performed in the non-adapted direction) such that their endpoint shifted rightward (as if the visual target was re-localized). But the authors questioned whether their subjects could have used the visible frame of the computer screen as a reference, thus allowing adaptation in allocentric -rather than in spatiotopic- coordinates. In the present study, we re-assessed this question by using targets LEDs presented in complete darkness to avoid any visual reference. Nine subjects performed the paradigm of Zimmermann et al. (2011) in this no-frame condition and in a frame condition, in two separate sessions. Repeated measures ANOVA (factors: frame/no-frame and pre/post) performed on the amplitude of leftward memory-guided double-saccades revealed a significant decrease after adaptation only when a frame was provided (interaction p<0.01), in agreement with the allocentric hypothesis of adaptation. Note however that the remapping processes which encode the parameters of the second saccade in this double-saccade task may have favored allocentric adaptation. Indeed, by testing memory-guided single-saccades after adaptation of rightward scanning saccades, we found a main effect of phase (p=0.026) but no interaction with the frame versus no frame conditions. This indicated that leftward memory-guided single-saccades significantly decreased after adaptation, with or without the frame, in agreement with spatiotopic adaptation. A last experiment testing the effect of the same adaptation on immediate single-saccades revealed oculocentric adaptation. Taken together, these three experiments indicate that the same saccadic adaptation can involve allocentric, spatiotopic and oculocentric coordinates.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.