July 2013
Volume 13, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2013
Perceived Size of a Moving Target
Author Affiliations
  • Alexandria Boswell
    Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno
  • Gennadiy Gurariy
    Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno
  • Gideon Caplovitz
    Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno
Journal of Vision July 2013, Vol.13, 1293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.1293
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alexandria Boswell, Gennadiy Gurariy, Gideon Caplovitz; Perceived Size of a Moving Target. Journal of Vision 2013;13(9):1293. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.1293.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

There is an extensive literature on size perception, but we know much less about the perception of motion trajectories. It is important we examine this more closely because perceiving trajectory size is not a trivial task. For example, Sinico et al. (2009) showed that people underestimate the size of a trajectory on which a dot is moving. In this study, we investigated how well people discriminate the size of a trajectory when compared to their size judgement of a stationary circle. In Experiment 1, we examined the perceived size of a trajectory of a dot moving 360° around a circular path. Experiment 2 examined how accurate people were at this task when the dot moved only a portion of the path, ranging from 90° to 355°. Experiment 3 examined accuracy when the dot moved in an arc exactly as in Experiment 2, but with the speed also randomized. Experiment 4 examined how accurately people judge the sizes of stationary circles with the same radii used to form the trajectories in the previous experiments. Results: people are less accurate at discriminating sizes across all motion conditions when compared to the stationary circle. They were even less accurate when the full trajectory was not transversed. Surprisingly, the speed of the traveling dot had little effect on participants‘ discrimination, which is interesting because one method of discrimination for this task is to use the speed of the moving dot to aid in the size judgement. This suggests that people are able to perform reasonably well on this task even without the aid of speed discrimination.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.