December 2013
Volume 13, Issue 15
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   October 2013
Estimating and discriminating defocus in natural images
Author Notes
  • Footnotes
     Moderator: Heidi Hofer, University of Houston
  • Footnotes
     Blur has long been regarded as a necessary evil, something that we are stuck with as a result of the laws of optics. But with regards to blur, the visual system again shows its facility to turn lemons into lemonade by adapting away some of the perceptual effects of blur and exploiting blur as a cue to depth. This symposium examines the visual mechanisms involved in the detection and discrimination of defocus and higher-order aberrations, along with the subsequent processing of these signals.
Journal of Vision October 2013, Vol.13, T2. doi:10.1167/13.15.2
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Wilson Geisler, Johannes Burge, Stephen Sebastian; Estimating and discriminating defocus in natural images. Journal of Vision 2013;13(15):T2. doi: 10.1167/13.15.2.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Defocus blur is ubiquitous. When objects at one distance are in best focus, objects at other distances are blurred—the greater the distance from the best-focus distance the greater the defocus blur. Furthermore, even when objects are in best focus, there are other factors, including higher-order monochromatic aberrations, chromatic aberrations, and diffraction, which introduce blur and thereby reduce image quality. Although reduced image quality is generally undesirable, there are ways in which it may be useful. For instance, defocus blur could be used as a cue to depth. Specifically, if the level and sign of defocus blur can be estimated from the image of an object, then it is possible to estimate the distance of that object from the from best focus distance. In recent work, we have determined how to optimally estimate the defocus in images of natural scenes. We find that both the magnitude and sign of defocus can be estimated accurately in optical systems (like the human eye) that have chromatic aberrations and/or monochromatic aberrations other than defocus. We have also made measurements of human ability to discriminate the defocus of natural image patches, and find that while performance depends on the particular patch, performance often exceeds that obtained with more standard laboratory test stimuli. We conclude that the normal aberrations in the human eye allow both the magnitude and sign of defocus to be accurately estimated in natural scenes.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.