December 2013
Volume 13, Issue 15
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   October 2013
Functional diversity among intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells
Author Notes
  • Footnotes
     Moderator: Joel Pokorny, University of Chicago
  • Footnotes
     It is now well-established that mammalian ganglion cells can exhibit intrinsic photosensitivity mediated by the photopigment melanopsin. How these cells contribute to visual function, and how they combine melanopsin signals with those from other types of photoreceptor, are topics of much current investigation. This symposium will feature talks that consider the role of melanopsin for conscious visual perception, how melanopsin contributes to the pupillary reflex, and the functional properties of intrinsically photosensitive ganglion cells.
Journal of Vision October 2013, Vol.13, T8. doi:10.1167/13.15.8
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Xiwu Zhao, Ben K. Stafford, Kwoon Y. Wong; Functional diversity among intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Vision 2013;13(15):T8. doi: 10.1167/13.15.8.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Melanopsin-expressing, intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) mediate non-image-forming visual responses, including pupillary constriction, circadian photoentrainment and suppression of pineal melatonin secretion. Five morphological types of ipRGCs, named M1 – M5, have been identified in mice. To better understand their functions, we studied the resting properties and light-evoked responses of all five cell types, by whole-cell-recording from ipRGCs genetically labeled with green fluorescent protein. In darkness, the five ipRGC types had different resting membrane potentials and generated action potentials at different rates, suggesting that they send different information to the brain even in the absence of light. All five cell types generated melanopsin-based (“intrinsic”) as well as synaptically driven (“extrinsic”) light responses. The intrinsic light responses of M1 cells were more sensitive and larger than those of M2 – M5 cells, and response peak latencies varied substantially among the cell types. In response to uniform full-field lights, the peak amplitudes of extrinsic light responses differed somewhat among the ipRGC types, although all cell types' responses had comparable thresholds, kinetics and waveforms. The receptive fields of M2 – M5 cells exhibited antagonistic center and surround regions, implicating a capacity to detect spatial contrast. On the other hand, M1 cells' receptive fields lacked surround antagonism, consistent with their primary role in non-image-forming vision. All ipRGCs responded robustly to a wide range of motion speeds and different cell types appeared to prefer different speeds, suggesting they might participate in motion analysis.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.