August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Attentional constraints on human foraging
Author Affiliations
  • Arni Kristjansson
    Department of Psychology, University of Iceland
  • Omar Johannesson
    Department of Psychology, University of Iceland
  • Ian M. Thornton
    Department of Cognitive Science, University of Malta
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 25. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Arni Kristjansson, Omar Johannesson, Ian M. Thornton; Attentional constraints on human foraging. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):25. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

How do humans search for multiple targets from more than one category? In contrast to animal research, such foraging has been largely neglected in human visual search, typically involving single-category, single-target trials that terminate with the first response. Here, we introduce a new iPad foraging task where observers cancel a series of targets among distractors by tapping them until all are gone. The number of possible target types and distractor types can vary independently. We asked how foraging changed as a function of target complexity. During feature-based foraging 16 naïve observers cancelled 40 green and red disks among yellow and blue distractors (or vice versa). During conjunction-foraging they cancelled red disks and green squares among green disks and red squares (or vice versa). Our main dependent variable was the number of "runs" per trial, which could vary between 40, if a target switch occurred after each response, and 2, if sequential subset searches were carried out. Random switching would result in mean run length of 20. For feature-based foraging, behavior was characterized by many short runs (M = 14), suggesting that observers could simultaneously maintain two or more color templates in mind and were happy to switch between them. For conjunction-based foraging, the pattern was dramatically different: observers focused on one target-type, finishing most or all of those before switching to the other target type (M = 5). In both conditions, more runs resulted in less overall movement, suggesting that switching might be the more "optimal" strategy. For conjunction foraging, this was mostly driven by 4 observers who were able to switch frequently despite the increase in target complexity. Our main, novel finding -- the striking difference between conjunction and feature-based behavior -- suggests that attention imposes a very sharp constraint on human foraging.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.