August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Dividing attention reduces both speed and temporal frequency limits on object tracking
Author Affiliations
  • Alex Holcombe
    School of Psychology, University of Sydney
  • Wei-Ying Chen
    School of Psychology, University of Sydney
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 352. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alex Holcombe, Wei-Ying Chen; Dividing attention reduces both speed and temporal frequency limits on object tracking. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):352. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Low-level motion processing is limited by temporal frequency, not speed: for a broad range of spatial frequencies, the fastest speeds at which motion is perceived correspond to a single temporal frequency, meaning that the threshold speed is proportional to the inverse of spatial frequency (Burr & Ross, 1982). Like low-level motion, attentional tracking also has a temporal frequency limit, but one that is much lower (7 Hz) and declines progressively with more targets to track. Also unlike low-level motion, attentional tracking additionally has a speed limit (Holcombe & Chen, 2013 and Verstraten et al., 2000), supporting a qualitative difference between tracking processes and low-level motion. Here, one tracking target revolved about the fixation point, along with a distractor or distractors sharing the same circular trajectory. When the number of distractors is higher than about four, and speed is increased, performance falls to threshold when a particular temporal frequency is reached. But for fewer distractors, the limiting factor instead appears to be speed. Like Verstraten et al. (2000) and Holcombe & Chen (2013), for one target we observe a limit of about 2 revolutions per second (rps). Here we varied the number of targets by presenting three concurrent, concentric displays. A second target reduced the speed limit by 0.4 rps, and a third target by a further 0.5 rps. Thus, dividing attention reduces tracking's speed limit substantially, just as it does its temporal frequency limit. Unlike the temporal frequency limit, the speed limit was not robust to changes in the number of distractors sharing the trajectory. When two rather than one distractor shared each target's trajectory, the speed limits fell by 0.5 rps. Theories of tracking must be modified if they are to explain how dividing attention reduces both limits, and additionally explain the decrease in speed limits caused by an additional distractor.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.