August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Visually guided grasping in depth is systematically inaccurate
Author Affiliations
  • Claire Walker
    Department of Cognitive, Linguistic & Psychological Sciences, Brown University
  • Carlo Campagnoli
    Department of Cognitive, Linguistic & Psychological Sciences, Brown University
  • Fulvio Domini
    Department of Cognitive, Linguistic & Psychological Sciences, Brown University
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 421. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Claire Walker, Carlo Campagnoli, Fulvio Domini; Visually guided grasping in depth is systematically inaccurate. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):421.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Current theories postulate that the visual system is divided into two parallel pathways: a dorsal stream that guides motor actions and a ventral stream for conscious perception and recognition of objects. It has been hypothesized that the dorsal stream has access to accurate 3D information. However, recent empirical findings cast serious doubts on this hypothesis, since we found that reach-to-grasp actions are highly inaccurate when visual feedback of the hand and haptic feedback of the objects are absent (Campagnoli et al., 2012; Foster et al., 2010). Here we investigated to what extent the visual feedback of the limb may improve the accuracy of a reach-to-grasp action. Participants were asked to grasp along the depth axis a virtual, disparity-defined vertical cylinder. In different trials, the simulated cylinder had different diameters (30 mm and 50 mm) and appeared at two different distances (280mm and 400mm). The cylinder was visible throughout every trial, whereas the visual feedback of the tips of the grasping fingers (e.g. index and thumb) was present from the start of the grasping action until the fingers reached a specified distance from the cylinder. In six consecutive blocks, this distance was 70mm, 30mm, 20mm, 15mm, 10mm, and 5 mm. In two control blocks, the visual feedback was either absent altogether (first block) or always present (last block). In all conditions, the Final Grip Aperture (FGA) was highly inaccurate, showing that the visual feedback of the fingers is not sufficient for an accurate reach-to-grasp action. Interestingly, we observed a dramatic improvement in FGA accuracy from the 70mm block to the 30mm block. However, no further improvement was observed in subsequent blocks (30 – 5 mm). These results are in contrast with the hypothesis that the dorsal stream performs a veridical metric analysis of objects for motor action.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.