August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Comparison of superior colliculus and primary visual cortex in the coding of visual saliency
Author Affiliations
  • Brian White
    Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University
  • David Berg
    IBM Research, San Jose, California
  • Takuro Ikeda
    Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University
  • Ron Levy
    Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University
  • Laurent Itti
    Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California
  • Douglas Munoz
    Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 517. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Brian White, David Berg, Takuro Ikeda, Ron Levy, Laurent Itti, Douglas Munoz; Comparison of superior colliculus and primary visual cortex in the coding of visual saliency. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):517.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

The superior colliculus (SC) is a phylogenetically ancient midbrain structure with purely visual representations in the superficial-layers (SCs), and sensorimotor representations linked to the control of eye movements/attention in the intermediate-layers (SCi). In primitive species, SC played a central role in vision and orienting independent of cortex. Through mammalian evolution, primary visual cortex (V1) introduced more specialized feature processing, but also became a dominant source of input for SCs. We quantified the relative roles of these early visual areas in the coding of higher-order stimuli that give rise to saliency in complex scenes. Rhesus monkeys viewed a wide-field arrangement of stimuli (210 radially-arranged items spanning ~40-50deg) extending beyond the classic receptive field (RF). The stimuli were oriented color bars (~0.4x1.2deg) that formed a perceptual "pop-out" array the monkeys had to ignore; i.e., reward was contingent upon gaze directed to a separate achromatic stimulus that always stepped orthogonal to the pop-out singleton. We compared visually-evoked responses when the goal-irrelevant pop-out singleton fell in versus opposite the RF, and compared it to a single-item control condition. First, visual onset latency was reliably earlier, and RFs 5-10 fold smaller, in V1 than SCs (or SCi). This is consistent with the idea that each SCs neuron might integrate the outputs of multiple V1 neurons. Second, surround suppression evoked by the wide-field array was dramatically stronger in SCs (and SCi) than V1. This indicates the prominence of long-range interactions in SC, an essential component of the saliency-map hypothesis. Lastly, only SCs neurons showed a reliable preference for the goal-irrelevant pop-out singleton; in SCi stimuli were heavily suppressed unless made goal-relevant. From these observations, we propose that V1 fits the role of a local feature processer, SCs a bottom-up saliency map, and SCi a priority map shaped by a combined representation of bottom-up saliency and top-down relevancy.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.