August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Sensitivity to local image statistics is (almost) scale-invariant
Author Affiliations
  • Mary M. Conte
    Brain and Mind Research Institute-Weill Cornell Medical College
  • Syed M. Rizvi
    Brain and Mind Research Institute-Weill Cornell Medical College
  • Daniel J. Thengone
    Brain and Mind Research Institute-Weill Cornell Medical College
  • Jonathan D. Victor
    Brain and Mind Research Institute-Weill Cornell Medical College
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 655. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mary M. Conte, Syed M. Rizvi, Daniel J. Thengone, Jonathan D. Victor; Sensitivity to local image statistics is (almost) scale-invariant. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):655.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Segmenting visual images into objects and identifying their surface properties require the analysis of local correlations, as these define the lines, edges, and texture. The relevant local correlations are captured by image statistics involving two or more nearby points. In natural images, these correlations occur together in a complex fashion, and across many spatial scales. This study asks how visual analysis of these correlations and their interactions depends on spatial scale. To analyze how the visual system processes multipoint correlations individually and in combination, we developed a space of artificial images in which these correlations can vary independently. The space focuses on specific types of correlations that are informative in natural images (Tkacik et al., PNAS 2010); this yields a 10-parameter domain of binary visual textures. Recently we showed that at a single spatial scale (14 min check size), visual sensitivity was concisely described by a Euclidean metric. Here, we extend the analysis to cover a 10-fold range of check sizes. In N=6 subjects, we measured texture segmentation thresholds (4-AFC paradigm) along all coordinate axes of the texture space and in coordinate planes covering combinations of image statistics from first- to fourth-order. Stimulus size (15 deg to 1.5 deg) varied in proportion to check size, to keep the number of checks constant. Over a fivefold range of check sizes (14 min to 2.8 min), sensitivities to all correlations remained in proportion to each other. For 1.4 min checks, sensitivity to two-point and higher-order correlations was selectively diminished, while sensitivity to first-order (luminance-driven) statistics was, as expected, preserved. We conclude that visual sensitivity to local statistics is approximately scale-invariant. Consequently, the tuning of visual sensitivity to the informativeness of image statistics in natural images (Briguglio et al., VSS 2013) holds across spatial scales as well.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.