August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Going beyond blindsight: properties of recovered vision in cortically blind fields
Author Affiliations
  • Anasuya Das
    Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester
  • Duje Tadin
    Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester
  • Krystel Huxlin
    Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 660. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Anasuya Das, Duje Tadin, Krystel Huxlin; Going beyond blindsight: properties of recovered vision in cortically blind fields. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):660.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Damage to the primary visual cortex (V1) or its immediate afferents results in a dense scotoma, termed cortical blindness (CB). CB subjects have some residual visual ability, termed blindsight, which allows them to process and even re-learn to discriminate stimuli with high temporal and low spatial frequency content. The present study asked whether training-induced visual re-learning following V1 damage can be elicited by stimuli outside the spatio-temporal bandwidth of blindsight. Specifically, can coarse orientation discrimination of static, non-flickering gabors be re-learned de novo in CB fields - i.e. without prior or concurrent training with moving or flickering stimuli. Second, can visual re-learning induced by such training transfer to untrained orientation and direction discriminations? Finally, does double training with a motion direction and a static orientation discrimination task provide any advantages in generalization of learning relative to training orientation alone. We found CB subjects are able to relearn static orientation discrimination following single as well as double training. However, a key dissociation emerged in the extent of transfer observed with the double-trained group demonstrating recovery of complex motion discrimination thresholds, including range and motion coherence thresholds, at the orientation-trained locations. The single-trained (static orientation only) group, on the other hand, could only discriminate simple motion stimuli. Both groups of subjects had roughly equivalent, though incomplete recovery of fine orientation and direction discrimination, as well as contrast sensitivity. In conclusion, CB subjects are able to relearn static orientation discrimination in their blind field, but those who train only on orientation discrimination generalize less to untrained motion stimuli. These findings suggest that although complex visual motion may be superior as a training stimulus, the cortically blind visual system is able to relearn to process a much wider range of stimuli than predicted by blindsight alone.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.