August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Saccadic system rhythmicity accounts for inhibition of return
Author Affiliations
  • Xiaoguang Tian
    Werner Reichhardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tuebingen
  • Ziad Hafed
    Werner Reichhardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tuebingen
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 750. doi:10.1167/14.10.750
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Xiaoguang Tian, Ziad Hafed; Saccadic system rhythmicity accounts for inhibition of return. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):750. doi: 10.1167/14.10.750.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

The birth of modern-day cognitive neuroscience came about through the discovery of a curious phenomenon. If a cue is presented at a location, the efficacy of subsequent orienting to that location is improved relative to other locations only immediately afterwards. A few hundred milliseconds later, orienting is associated with much larger costs. These costs have been termed "inhibition of return" (IOR), alluding to cognitive strategies avoiding perseverance at one location. However, despite this hypothesis, the origins of IOR remain elusive. Here we show that classic IOR may simply reflect saccadic system rhythmicity and how it is reset by stimulus onsets. We hypothesize that cue onset always creates an orienting reflex, but it is manifested in microsaccades. This orienting reflex represents a phase resetting of the saccadic system (Hafed & Ignashchenkova, J. Neurosci., 2013). If a subsequent target is now presented, the efficacy of orienting towards it will depend on the phase of saccadic rhythms at which the target appears: if the oculomotor system is already prepared to move in a direction, reaction times opposite this direction will be slower. To test this, we ran 16 humans in a cueing paradigm. Subjects fixated a central spot, and a brief cue (35-ms, 1-deg radius white circle) appeared 5 deg to the right/left. After a cue-target-onset-asynchrony (47, 94, 141, 247, 541, or 1247 ms), a second circle appeared at the cued/opposite location. Saccadic reaction times (SRT) replicated classic IOR. Microsaccades showed systematic rhythmicity, which was reset by cue/target onset. SRT distributions critically depended on the phase of this rhythmicity, and IOR was strongest when targets appeared at a time of increased microsaccades opposite the cue. Thus, when the whole gamut of saccadic activity is considered, IOR becomes an emergent property of phase modulations of saccade/microsaccade rhythms, largely independent of high-level cognitive strategies.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.