August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Crowding and Visual Field Inhomogenieties
Author Affiliations
  • Jennifer Anderson
    Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago
  • E. Leslie Cameron
    Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago
  • J. Jason McAnany
    Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago
  • Michael Levine
    Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 771. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jennifer Anderson, E. Leslie Cameron, J. Jason McAnany, Michael Levine; Crowding and Visual Field Inhomogenieties. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):771. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

For many visual tasks, performance across the visual field is asymmetric typically best along the horizontal meridian (HM) and worst directly above fixation (North). However, this phenomenon has not been examined within a crowding paradigm. Our purpose was to investigate visual field asymmetries in a crowding task by determining how crowder configuration affects threshold throughout the visual field. Crowding thresholds were measured across eight isoeccentric visual field locations in a target discrimination task: Experiment 1 measured crowding threshold for a target within a symmetric ring of crowders, Experiment 2 tested various subsets of this ring. We were interested in how well targets could resist crowding, thus results are reported in terms of "robustness", the inverse of the crowding threshold (1/crowding threshold). Visual field data were fit with ellipses. In Experiment 1, robustness was strongest along the HM and weakest at North and the presence of visual field asymmetries was confirmed. In Experiment 2, the largest differences in visual field robustness patterns were observed when crowders were "between" or "outside" the target and fixation. When "outside" (i.e., crowders at greater eccentricity than the target), visual field patterns indicated high levels of robustness along the HM and robustness data were well fit by a somewhat flattened ellipse. When "between" (i.e., crowders located between fixation and target), the mean robustness of the HM was equivalent to that of the vertical meridian (VM). However, robustness was weak at North and strong at South, presenting an effective "shift" along the VM. These data demonstrate that visual field asymmetries exist even in the context of crowding stimuli. However the specific asymmetric pattern depends upon the configuration of the crowders relative to both the target and fixation. In particular, processing along the vertical meridian is unique, and crowder configuration can either inhibit or enhance robustness.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.