August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Random-sampling leads to multiplicative noise in crowded displays
Author Affiliations
  • Carl Gaspar
    Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, Hangzhou Normal University
  • Wei Chen
    Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, Hangzhou Normal University
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 774. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Carl Gaspar, Wei Chen; Random-sampling leads to multiplicative noise in crowded displays. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):774.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Is crowding stochastic? Dakin, Cass, Greenwood and Bex (2010) show that their crowding results are consistent with a model that assigns random weights to multiple flanking elements. If observers are judging the orientation of a peripheral Gabor target, then this random-sampling model predicts that internal noise should increase with the variance of flanker-orientation – a form of multiplicative noise. We tested this hypothesis directly by measuring the effect of flanker-orientation variance on response consistency in a 2AFC orientation discrimination task. 2 observers (Burgess & Colborne, 1988) identified which of 2 peripheral Gabor patches (2.5 degrees eccentricity), surrounded by 8 Gabor flankers, was tilted (clockwise or counterclockwise from horizontal). Target-orientation was varied using method-of-constant-stimulus, and an exact copy of each stimulus was shown in repeated trials (same target-orientation and configuration of flanker orientations). Orientation thresholds and response-consistency were measured separately for various levels of flanker-orientation variance (3 levels in Observer 1, spanning an 8-fold range; and 4 levels in Observer 2, spanning a 16-fold range). Critically, the mean of flanker orientation was always 0 (horizontal) for every stimulus; performance could only be affected by flanker variance. For both observers, orientation thresholds increased with flanker variance by a log-log slope of 1/2. Most importantly, response-consistency data for both observers show that the slope between proportion-correct and proportion-agreement reached an upper asymptote at the highest flanker variance, which is the signature of muliplicative noise and consistent with the model of random-sampling suggested by Dakin et al. (2010). In a current experiment we are varying the number of flankers as well as their orientation-variance, and predict that a random-sampling model can be well fit to all these data.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.