August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Revaluating the Visual Short-Term Memory Benefit for 3-D Stimuli
Author Affiliations
  • Sarah R. Zohar
    Department of Psychology, Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Canada
  • Laurie M. Wilcox
    Department of Psychology, Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Canada
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 859. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sarah R. Zohar, Laurie M. Wilcox; Revaluating the Visual Short-Term Memory Benefit for 3-D Stimuli. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):859.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Given the 3-D nature of the visual environment, it is surprising that the majority of research in visual short-term memory (VSTM) has focussed on 2-D object properties. Experiments that have assessed effects of 3-D location on VSTM used sequentially presented depth planes (Xu & Nakayama, 2007, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 136, 653-662). Due to vergence eye movements, these sequential arrays were effectively presented at zero disparity. Here we use a different paradigm to evaluate the effect of distributing elements in depth on VSTM. Oriented line segments (square brackets) served as the visual stimulus to be retained in VSTM. We used a letter recall task to keep observers from rehearsing a cognitive descriptor of bracket orientation (e.g. up, down, left, right). On each trial, observers viewed a series of (3-4) letters (750ms) followed by an array of square brackets (1000ms) presented at two randomly selected orientations on each trial. In the test phase another set of letters appeared and observers indicated if they were the same or different from the first (50% of trials one letter was different). Two square brackets then appeared and again observers indicated same or different (50% of trials one item was different). Reaction time was measured for each task. There were four stimulus conditions: i) zero disparity (single plane) ii) zero disparity half density iii) two disparity-defined planes with oriented brackets randomly distributed iv) two disparity-defined planes each consisting of one orientation. Our proportion correct and d' measures show that VSTM does benefit from simultaneous distribution of elements across depth planes. However, the advantage is not due to increased sensitivity in the 3-D offset condition, but to reduced sensitivity in the single plane condition. We conclude that location binding is not the critical factor; the addition of multiple planes helps isolate features of interest, permitting efficient storage.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.