August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Suppressive effects of feature-based attention to motion and orientation
Author Affiliations
  • Yixue Wang
    Department of Psychology, Michigan State University
  • Taosheng Liu
    Department of Psychology, Michigan State University
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 1047. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yixue Wang, Taosheng Liu; Suppressive effects of feature-based attention to motion and orientation. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):1047.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Attending to a feature enhances visual processing of that feature, but it is less clear what occurs to other unattended features. Single-unit recording studies in MT have shown a monotonic relationship between neuronal activity and the offset between the attended and neuron's preferred direction. Such a relationship should predict a monotonic suppressive effect in psychophysical performance. However, past research on suppressive effects of feature-based attention has remained inconclusive. We investigated the suppressive effect for motion direction and orientation in two experiments. In the motion experiment, participants discriminated a low coherence random dot motion (RDM) stimulus and a 0% coherent RDM stimulus. In cued trials, a cue appeared prior to the stimuli to indicate the likely direction of the signal, while in neutral trials, no cue appeared. Participants reported which interval contained the coherent motion signal. Critically, the cue was only partially valid, and on invalid trials the offset between the cued and signal direction was systematically manipulated. The orientation experiment used a similar design, with participants discriminating between a low-contrast grating embedded in noise and noise alone. A partially valid cue indicated the likely orientation of the signal grating. We measured discrimination accuracy as a function of the offset between the cued feature and signal feature. Consistent with previous research, performance was higher on valid than neutral trials. Importantly, we found lower performance for invalid trials compared to neutral trials, indicating a suppressive effect for unattended features. Interestingly, the profile of suppression for direction showed a 'rebound effect' such that maximal suppression occurred for offset ~90° but declined for larger offsets near 180°. However, the profile of suppression for orientation exhibited a monotonic function without the rebound. These results demonstrate that unattended features are suppressed during feature-based attention, but the exact tuning function depends on the specific feature.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.